Blog

Counting Up the Benefits that Leaf-Spine Architecture Brings to Enterprise Networks

 

Benefits - Business Concept. Button on Modern Computer Keyboard. 3D Render.If your network, like most, is growing in size and complexity, perhaps it’s time to consider whether the traditional three-tier network architecture has run its course. It’s becoming apparent that a flatter, two-tier leaf spine network topology can bring dramatic changes in the way we manage networks – with as good or better performance.

Common enterprise  network challenges

For decades we’ve been building networks based on the three-tier model: access, aggregation and core. Typical enterprise environments based on this model can easily comprise hundreds or thousands of individual networking devices, creating numerous challenges for implementation and operations teams to overcome in managing and maintaining the networks.

Sure, the teams have lots of software tools to manage and monitor the infrastructure, but they often have little to no integration with each other. Ongoing configuration management along with upgrades, policy and security changes therefore become exceedingly complex and time-consuming, often requiring administrators to log into each device, one at a time, to make changes.

And all the while, the network is often not efficiently utilizing bandwidth due to the use of Spanning Tree Protocol (STP). While the network is likely built with redundant links between access layer and aggregation layer switches, STP only enables one of those links to carry traffic at any given time, to prevent broadcast storms and loops. The result is increased network oversubscription and added cost.  

Advantages of leaf spine architecture

The leaf-spine architecture, which was created for data center networks, simplifies the network architecture because it consists of just two layers, leaf and spine.

In a leaf-spine topology, leaf switches connect to end devices. In a data center, these include servers, firewalls, edge routers, load balancers and the like. For redundancy, each leaf switch connects to multiple spine layer switches, perhaps even to all of them in a data center deployment.

The leaf-spine network topology offers redundancy without paying the STP inefficiency tax. It offers multiple connections from one switch to any other but, because it doesn’t rely on STP, all those connections can be active. Instead of STP, for example, multi-chassis link aggregation (MLAG) can be be used to synchronize forwarding state between peer switches, so if a leaf or spine switch fails, traffic is automatically rerouted for continuous uptime.

That ability to use multiple network paths at once also brings improved performance. So, too, does the fact that from a logical perspective, any given device is only one hop away from any other. The network is also highly scalable, because adding new switches also brings multiple new network routes.

PicaPilotTM simplifies network management for the enterprise 

The leaf-spine architecture has proven itself in data center networks running white box switches But it’s only more recently been deployed in the broader enterprise, including branch offices and campus networks, due to the advent of enabling technology such as Pica8’s PicaPilotTM.

PicaPilot, an application built for Pica8’s PICOS® open, Linux-based network operating system (NOS), enables enterprises to build leaf-spine networks that scale to connect almost any number of 1G to 100G low cost, open white box switches. PicaPilot and PICOS can therefore be used to build white box networks that span just the floor of a building from a wiring closet, an entire building, or a campus.

PicaPilot dramatically simplifies network management because it enables administrators to manage dozens of white box switches as if they were a single, logical high-bandwidth switch with a single, consolidated IP address.

Picture a three-building campus, with maybe 20 switches in each building, each with its own IP address. With PicaPilot, all 20 of those switches would become a single logical switch, configured and managed as a single IP address. So instead of managing 60 switches, you’re managing three. Just think about how that simplifies configuration changes, security updates and the like.

At the same time, you get all the advantages that open white box disaggregated networking brings, including the ability to upgrade network hardware or NOS at any time. That enables you to take advantage of advances in hardware or software as they happen, so you’re constantly on the cutting edge of switch performance.

That’s an important consideration given the pace of change in network switching silicon. As a direct example, it took 2 years for Broadcom to go from offering switching ASICs with 3.2Tbps of bandwidth to offering one with 6.4Tbps of bandwidth. It took only another 14 months after that for Broadcom to introduce 12.8Tbps “Monster Bandwidth” ASICs.   

An even more exiting trend for the enterprise campus is that Broadcom has introduced its next-generation programmable and feature-rich ASIC for the enterprise market. Even if you don’t need these kinds of capacity or flexibility today, think of these trends as a way to future-proof your network.  No longer do enterprise customers have to wait 6-8 years for the proprietary networking vendors to bring a new chassis to market. It’s now possible to build open networking campus networks that are modular, flexbible and extreme scalable, at much lower CapEx than with proprietary solutions.

 t’s time to consider a new way to build and manage enterprise networks. The three-tier architecture has had its day. The open networking leaf-spine architecture represents the new best-in-class approach, and PicaPilot helps you bring it across the enterprise on high-performance, low-cost open white box hardware. 

To learn more, download our free white paper, “PicaPilot: Network Fabric Orchestration Comes to the Enterprise.

 

 

Tagged Linux NOS, White Box Switch, Open White Box, White Box Networks, Spine and Leaf Architecture, Leaf Spine Network, Spine and Leaf Network Topology